references |
name |
notes |
Books of Adjournal
JC2/11; JC2/10 fos. 10v-17v
|
JC2/11 and JC2/10 have exactly the same text! Except the sederunt in JC2/10 doesn't say that the trial happened in Dalkeith. Also found in the High Court Record Index, no. 1 for 3/8/1661, this index did not distinguish between circuit and high court cases. This list of names was added in the margins with a modern hand, no indication of where the person got the list. |
Books of Adjournal
JC2/11; JC2/10 fos. 34r-41r
|
mentioned |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 2
|
It’s a preliminary report with witness testimony, a preliminary dittay. |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 4
|
Draft of the JC2 trial |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 7
|
similar content as JC26/27/9 item 4, only with better hand writing |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 20
|
witnesses, bad handwriting, mostly repeat of info in other docs. Seems to be a draft of the Books of Adjournal text. |