references |
name |
notes |
Books of Adjournal
JC2/11; JC2/10 fo. 10v-17v
|
JC2/10 and 2/11 are exactly the same text! Except the sederunt in JC2/10 doesn't say that the trial happened in Dalkeith. Also found in the High Court Record Index, no. 1 for 3/8/1661, this index did not distinguish between circuit and high court cases. This list of names was added in the margins with a modern hand, no indication of where the person got the list. |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 4 and item 5
|
draft of JC2 trial. Item 5 is a continuation of item 4 |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 9
|
None |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 13
|
None |
High Court Process Notes
JC26/27/9 item 19
|
witness statements during the trial |
High Court Process Notes
JC16/27/9 item 20
|
witnesses, bad handwriting, mostly repeat of information in other documents. Seems to be a draft of the books of adjournal text. |